PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MPLS AND TRADITIONAL IP IN NODE SCALABLE NETWORKS

  • Muhammad Arshad City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Lala Rukh Institute of Business and Management Sciences, University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Hussain Shah Shaykh Zayed Islamic Center, University of Peshawar , Pakistan
  • Bilal Khan City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan

Abstract

Multiprotocol label switching is the latest and developing technology in the world of the internet. It speeds up the network by using the technique of label instead of an IP address. It provides reliable transmission of data with high speed and low delay. For efficient use of network utilization MPLS has a key feature of QoS. Due to the effective utilization of network resources, minimum delay and predictable performance MPLS technology make it more appropriate for implementing multimedia type applications. In this research, the performance of MPLS technology is compared with the traditional IP network for multimedia traffic in node scalable networks. For simulating and comparing the performance of both technologies OPNET modular 14.5 is used. This comparison is done on the basis of network performance parameters such as packet loss/ traffic drop, end-to-end delay, and throughput. Finally, the results have been evaluated which show that MPLS technology provides better performance as compared to IP in node scalable environment.

References

[1] S. Veni, G. M. Kadhar Nawaz, and P. Praba, “Performance analysis of network traffic behavior in conventional network over MPLS,” 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Control Comput. Technol. ICCCCT 2010, pp. 222–226, 2010.
[2] R. Shaker Naoum and M. Maswady, “Performance Evaluation for VOIP over IP and MPLS,” World Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 110–114, 2012.
[3] P. Ahlawat, “Comparison between Traditional IP Networks / Routing and MPLS,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, 2015.
[4] K. Jannu and R. Deekonda, “OPNET simulation of voice over MPLS,” no. June, 2010.
[5] M. Bhandure, “Comparative Analysis of Mpls and Non -Mpls Network,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 3, no. 4. pp. 71–76, 2013.
[6] L. He and P. Botham, “Pure MPLS technology,” ARES 2008 - 3rd International Conference on Availability, Security, and Reliability, Proceedings. pp. 253–259, 2008.
[7] M. A. Rahman, A. H. Kabir, K. A. M. Lutfullah, M. Z. Hassan, and M. R. Amin, “Performance analysis and the study of the behavior of MPLS protocols,” Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2008, ICCCE08 Glob. Links Hum. Dev., no. July, pp. 226–229, 2008.
[8] R. Mishra and H. Ahmad, “Comparative Analysis of Conventional IP Network and MPLS Network over VoIP Application,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4496–4499, 2014.
[9] A. Sharma, R. Kumar, and V. Mansotra, “Proposed Stemming Algorithm for Hindi Information Retrieval,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. (An ISO Certif. Organ., vol. 3297, no. 6, pp. 11449–11455, 2016.
[10] J. Tahir, M. Z. Siddiqi, and S. Arif, “Performance analysis of MPLS based networks with conventional networks,” Proc. 2017 2nd Work. Recent Trends Telecommun. Res. RTTR 2017, pp. 17–20, 2017.
[11] A. Katiyar and P. K. Shrama, “OPTIMIZATION OF MPLS AND IP NETWORK IN VOICE,” no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2017.
[12] A.-B. R. Sulaiman and O. K. Salih Alhafidh, “Performance Analysis of Multimedia Traffic over MPLS Communication Networks with Traffic Engineering,” Int. J. Comput. Networks Commun. Secur. Multiprotocol Label Switch. (MPLS), Traffic Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 93–101, 2014.
[13] J. F. Banu, K. G. Shanthi, P. L. Priya, and M. F. Begum, “Performance Enhancement Architecture of VoIP Applications in Multiprotocol Label Switching Networks,” Circuits Syst., vol. 07, no. 08, pp. 2047–2058, 2016
Published
2019-06-30
Section
Articles